Al-Qadisiyah Journal for Engineering Sciences

Thermodynamic analysis of small-scale CSP based on ORC systems compared with PV systems in North Africa zone. (Algeria as a case study)

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

Touil A. 1, 2
Nehari D. 3, 4
Laissaoui M. 5
Benzaama H. 6

1 Ecole Nationale Polytechnique d’Oran, Algerie.

2 Scientific and Technical Research Center on Arid Regions, CRSTRA, Biskra, Algeria.

3 University Center of Ain T´emouchant, Algeria.

4 Laboratory of Applied Hydrology and Environment, University of Ain Temouchent, Algeria.

5 Centre de Developpement des Energies Renouvelables BP. 62 Route de l’Observatoire Bouzareah 16340 Alger, Algeria.

6 National Polytechnic School of Oran, Algeria.

10.30772/qjes.2025.156874.1486
Abstract
This study presents a simulation of electricity generation systems utilizing solar energy, employing TRNSYS and EES software to address the energy needs of isolated areas in Algeria. Two solar energy systems were compared: the CSP-ORC and the Photovoltaic, analyzed across three regions: Adrar, Illizi, and El-Bayadh. The CSP-ORC system was enhanced by incorporating components for optimizing the operation of the pump within the ORC, as well as integrating a solar photovoltaic system with battery storage at a capacity of 50 kW. The estimated electrical power generated by the studied systems is approximately 1 MW. We compared the technical performance of a 1 MW s-ORC system with thermal energy storage against that of a solar photovoltaic system of the same capacity. This analysis underscores the viability of both CSP-ORC and PV systems for electricity generation in isolated arid regions of Algeria. However, the superior performance of the PV system, particularly during the winter months, suggests that while CSP-ORC systems are promising, they may require further enhancements or integrated solutions (such as hybrid systems) to improve output and reliability across all seasons. The economic analysis highlights the cost-effectiveness of PV systems, which have lower investment, maintenance costs, and LCOE than CSP-ORC. The lowest LCOE (0.0311 €/kWh) and fastest payback (3.62 years) were observed in Illizi for PV, while CSP-ORC had the highest LCOE in El-Bayadh. Environmentally, PV reduces 55.2 tons of CO2 emissions in Illizi, whereas CSP-ORC, generating more electricity, prevents 84 tons. Both systems significantly cut emissions compared to diesel generators. 

Keywords

Thermodynamic analysis
Concentrating solar power
Organic Rankine Cycle
Photovoltaic
North Africa
Algeria
  1. RENA, “Global energy transformation: A roadmap to 2050,” International Renewable Energy Agency, 2019 edition. [Online]. Available:
    www.irena.org/publications
  2. P. N. Botsaris, A. G. Pechtelidis, and K. A. Lymperopoulos, “Modeling, simulation, and performance evaluation analysis of a parabolic trough solar collector
    power plant coupled to an organic rankine cycle engine in north eastern greece using trnsys,” Journal of Solar Energy Engineering, vol. 141, no. 6, p. 061004,
    05 2019. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4043658
  3. M. Petrollese, G. Cau, and D. Cocco, “The Ottana solar facility: dispatchable power from small-scale CSP plants based on ORC systems,” Renewable Energy,
    vol. 147, pp. 2932–2943, 2020, oRC in Renewable Energy Systems, ORC 2017 Special Issue. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2018.07.013
  4. Y.-L. He, D.-H. Mei, W.-Q. Tao, W.-W. Yang, and H.-L. Liu, “Simulation of the parabolic trough solar energy generation system with organic rankine cycle,”
    Applied Energy, vol. 97, pp. 630–641, 2012, energy Solutions for a Sustainable World - Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Applied Energy,
    May 16-18, 2011 - Perugia, Italy. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2012.02.047
  5. M. Borunda, O. Jaramillo, R. Dorantes, and A. Reyes, “Organic rankine cycle coupling with a parabolic trough solar power plant for cogeneration and
    industrial processes,” Renewable Energy, vol. 86, pp. 651–663, 2016. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2015.08.041
  6. L. Tocci, T. Pal, I. Pesmazoglou, and B. Franchetti, “Small scale organic rankine cycle (ORC): A techno-economic review,” Energies (MDPI), vol. 10, no. 4, p.
    413, 2017. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.3390/en10040413
  7. H.-C. Jung and C. Y. Cha, “Sizing a parabolic trough collectoe for a micro solar organic rankine cycle,” Jurnalteknologi(Sciences Engineering), vol. 81,
    no. 2, p. 123 – 133, 2019. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.11113/jt.v81.12304
  8. A. R. Archibold, J. Gonzalez-Aguilar, M. M. Rahman, D. Yogi Goswami, M. Romero, and E. K. Stefanakos, “The melting process of storage materials
    with relatively high phase change temperatures in partially filled spherical shells,” Applied Energy, vol. 116, pp. 243–252, 2014. [Online]. Available:
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2013.11.048
  9. G. Zhu, C. Turchi, D. Wendt, G. Mines, S. Cohan, L. Angelini, F. Bizzarri, D. Consoli, and A. Marzo, “Stillwater hybrid geo-solar power plant optimization
    analyses,” pp. 891–900, 2015, publisher Copyright: © Copyright (2015) by Geothermal Resources Council All rights reserved.; 39th Geothermal
    Resources Council Annual Meeting - Geothermal: Always On, GRC 2015 ; Conference date: 20-09-2015 Through 23-09-2015. [Online]. Available:
    https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/84964031577
  10. H. GunhanOzcan, H. Gunerhan, N. Yildirim, and A. Hepbasli, “A comprehensive evaluation of PV electricity production methods and life
    cycle energy-cost assessment of a particular system,” Journal of Cleaner Production, vol. 238, no. 2, p. 117883, 2019. [Online]. Available:
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.117883
  11. M. Petrollese and D. Cocco, “Optimal design of a hybrid CSP-PV plant for achieving the full dispatchability of solar energy power plants,” Solar Energy, vol.
    137, no. 2016, p. 477–489, 2016. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solener.2016.08.027
  12. D. V., K. G., S. M., and K. D., “Test results segs ls-2 solar collector, New Mexico,” Sandia National Laboratories, December 1994. [Online]. Available:
    https://doi.org/10.2172/70756
  13. J. Z. Alvi, Z. Guan, and M. Imran, “Thermoeconomic evaluation and sustainability insights of hybrid solar–biomass powered organic rankine cycle systems:
    A comprehensive review,” Biomass, vol. 4, no. 4, pp. 1092–1121, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.3390/biomass4040061
  14. H. Berrebah, T. Baki, and M. Tebbal, “Comprehensive investigation of solar water heater system performance, stratification, charging, and discharging
    efficiency using TRNSYS software,” Acta Mechanica Slovaca, vol. 28, no. 1, pp. 26–36, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.21496/ams.2024.005
  15. M. Lazreg, T. Baki, and D. Nehari, “Influence of the number of tanks on the performance of a domestic solar water heater,” Acta Mechanica Slovaca, vol. 27,
    no. 4, pp. 14–21, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.21496/ams.2023.037
  16. S. A. Klein et al., “Trnsys 16.1: A transient system simulation program,” Mathematical Reference, 2007. [Online]. Available: http://sel.me.wisc.edu/trnsys
  17. A. Khelif, A. Talha, M. Belhamel, and A. H. Arab, “Feasibility study of hybrid diesel–PV power plants in the southern of Algeria: case study
    on Afra power plant.” International Journal of Electrical Power and Energy Systems, vol. 43, no. 1, p. 546–553, 2012. [Online]. Available:
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijepes.2012.06.053
  18. S. Quoilin, J. Lebrun, and V. Lemort, “Experimental study and modeling of an organic rankine cycle using scroll expander,” Journal of Applied Energy,
    vol. 87, no. 4, pp. 1260–1268, 2010. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2009.06.026
  19. Duffie and Beckman, “Solar engineering of thermal processes,” John Wiley and Sons, p. 122905, 2013. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1002/978111
    8671603
  20. S. K. Panja, B. Das, and V. Mahesh, “Performance evaluation of a novel parabolic trough solar collector with nanofluids and porous inserts,” Applied Thermal
    Engineering, vol. 258, p. 124495, 2025. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2024.124495
  21. A. AlZahrani and I. Dincer, “Energy and exergy analyses of a parabolic trough solar power plant using carbon dioxide power cycle,” Energy Conversion and
    Management, vol. 158, pp. 476–488, 2018. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2017.12.071
  22. S. Quoilin, M. Orosz, H. Hemond, and V. Lemort, “Performance and design optimization of a low-cost organic rankine cycle for remote power generation,”
    Solar Energy, vol. 85, pp. 955–966, January 2011. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solener.2011.02.010
  23. T. Alqahtani, “Performance evaluation of a solar thermal storage system proposed for concentrated solar power plants,” Applied Thermal Engineering, vol.
    229, p. 120665, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2023.120665
  24. S. Baral, “Experimental and techno-economic analysis of solar-geothermal organic rankine cycle technology for power generation in nepal,” International
    Journal of Photoenergy, vol. 2019, no. 1, p. 5814265, 2019. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/5814265
  25. NREL, “System advisor model (SAM),” National Renewable Energy Laboratory, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://sam.nrel.gov/
  26. M. Villalva, J. Gazoli, and E. Filho, “Comprehensive approach to modeling and simulation of photovoltaic arrays,” IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics,
    vol. 24, no. 5, pp. 1198–1208., 2009. [Online]. Available: http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/TPEL.2009.2013862
  27. V. Ramasamy, D. Feldman, J. Desai, and R. Margolis, “U.S. solar photovoltaic system and energy storage cost benchmarks,” National Renewable Energy
    Laboratory NREL , 2021. [Online]. Available: https://www.nrel.gov/docs/fy22osti/80694.pdf
  28. D. Talavera, E. Mu ˜noz-Cer ´on, J. Ferrer-Rodr´ıguez, and P. J. P ´erez-Higueras, “Assessment of cost-competitiveness and profitability of fixed
    and tracking photovoltaic systems: The case of five specific sites,” Renewable Energy, vol. 134, pp. 902–913, 2019. [Online]. Available:
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2018.11.091
  29. F. Mandys, M. Chitnis, and S. Silva, “Levelized cost estimates of solar photovoltaic electricity in the United Kingdom,” Patterns, vol. 4, no. 5, p. 100735,
    2023. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.patter.2023.100735
  30. R. Barbosa, B. Escobar, V. M. S ´anchez, and J. Orteg ´on, “Effects of the size and cost reduction on a discounted payback period and levelized
    cost of energy of a zero-export photovoltaic system with green hydrogen storage,” Heliyon, vol. 9, no. 6, p. e16707, 2023. [Online]. Available:
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e16707
  31. N. Ludin, N. Alyssa, K. Purvis-Roberts, A. Ahmad, M. Ibrahim, K. Sopian, and S. Jusoh, “Environmental impact and levelised cost of energy analysis
    of photovoltaic systems: in selected Asia pacific region: A cradle-to-grave approach,” Sustainability, vol. 13, no. 1, p. 396, 2021. [Online]. Available:
    https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/1/396
  32. E. Ardeh, R. Loni, G. Najafi, B. Ghobadian, E. Bellos, and D.Wen, “Exergy and economic assessments of solar organic rankine cycle system with linear
    V-Shape cavity,” Energy Conversion and Management, vol. 199, no. 5, p. 111997, 2019. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2019.111997
  33. R. Vikas, V. Irappa, R. Shreyas, P. Garg, M. S., and N. Thirumalai, “Techno-economic comparison of solar organic rankine cycle (ORC) and photovoltaic (PV)
    systems with energy storage,” Renewable Energy, vol. 113, no. 1, pp. 1250–1260, 2017. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2017.06.107
  34. S. Baral, D. Kim, E. Yun, and K. Kim, “Experimental and thermoeconomic analysis of small-scale solar organic rankine cycle (SORC) system,” Entropy,
    vol. 17, no. 4, pp. 2039–2061, 2015. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.3390/e17042039
  35. D. Young-Woo, B. Seung-Min, B. Seung-Yun, J. Hyeon-Ho, K. Yeon-Soo, K. Yong-Joo, and K. Wan-Soo, “Determining exhaust emissions (CO, NOx, PM)
    for a combine harvester based on measured engine load and emission factors using pems during actual field operation,” Computers and Electronics in
    Agriculture, vol. 231, p. 110026, 2025. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compag.2025.110026
Al-Qadisiyah Journal for Engineering Sciences
Volume 19, Issue 1
Winter 2026
Pages 98-109

  • Receive Date 22 January 2025
  • Revise Date 03 October 2025
  • Accept Date 10 December 2025

Submit Manuscript

Guide for Authors

Article Processing Charges (APC)

Reviewers

Call for Reviewers

Contact Us