Al-Qadisiyah Journal for Engineering Sciences

Printability and strength of 3D-printed concrete: Role of mix design and printing parameters

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

Marwah Manea Thajeel 1
Ameen Hasan Chalawi 2
György Balázs 1

1 Department of Construction Materials and Technologies, Faculty of Civil Engineering, Budapest University of Technology and Economics, Budapest, Hungary.

2 Department of Engineering Geology and Geotechnics, Faculty of Civil Engineering, Budapest University of Technology and Economics. Budapest, Hungary

10.30772/qjes.2025.155882.1448
Abstract
This study investigates the properties of 3D printed concrete mixtures, focusing on rheological characteristics, compressive strength, anisotropy, and printing path effects. Two mixtures were compared: M-1 (90% cement, 10% metakaolin) and M-2 (85% cement, 10% metakaolin, 5% silica fume). M-2 demonstrated superior performance in flowability, shape retention, and buildability, allowing for 164% more printed layers than M-1. Compressive strength tests revealed that 3D printed specimens consistently exhibited lower strength compared to cast specimens due to layering effects and anisotropy. M-2 showed higher compressive strength in both cast and printed cubes. Significant anisotropy was observed in mechanical properties, with compressive strength highest in the X direction and lowest in the Y direction. Flexural strength and elastic modulus also varied depending on loading direction. Among printing patterns, the zigzag pattern with 90-degree rotation between layers (P1) exhibited the highest compressive strength, while circular patterns (P2) showed the lowest. These findings emphasize the importance of optimizing mix design, printing parameters, and loading direction considerations for 3D printed concrete structures.

Keywords

Anisotropy
Compressive strength
Printing paths
Rheological properties
Supplementary cementitious materials
3D printed concrete
  • S. Ismail and M. Ramli, “Engineering properties of treated recycled concrete aggregate (rca) for structural applications,” Construction and Building Materials, vol. 44, pp. 464–476, 2013. [Online]. Available:
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2013.03.014
  • B. Nematollahi, M. Xia, and J. Sanjayan, Current progress of 3D concrete printing technologies. IAARC Publications, 2017, vol. 34.
  • S. H. Reddy, K. M. Peera, A. Surendra, C. Arvind kumar, and M. Leelakar, “Role of nano-al2o3 in modifying the properties of ultra high performance concrete,” Al-Qadisiyah Journal for Engineering
    Sciences, vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 72–77, 2025. [Online]. Available: https://qjes.qu.edu.iq/article 186243.html
  • S. H. Ghaffar, J. Corker, and P. Mullett, The potential for additive manufacturing to transform the construction industry. Routledge, 2020.
  • H. Yan, Q. Shen, L. C. Fan, Y. Wang, and L. Zhang, “Greenhouse gas emissions in building construction: A case study of one peking in hong kong,” Building and environment, vol. 45, no. 4, pp. 949–955, 2010. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2009.09.014
  • S. Paritala, K. K. Singaram, I. Bathina, M. A. Khan, and S. K. R. Jyosyula, “Rheology and pumpability of mix suitable for extrusion-based concrete 3d printing–a review,” Construction and Building Materials, vol. 402, p. 132962, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2023.132962
  • B. Panda and M. J. Tan, “Experimental study on mix proportion and fresh properties of fly ash based geopolymer for 3d concrete printing,” Ceramics International, vol. 44, no. 9, pp. 10 258–10 265, 2018. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceramint.2018.03.031
  • B. Panda, C. Unluer, and M. J. Tan, “Investigation of the rheology and strength of geopolymer mixtures for extrusion-based 3d printing,” Cement and Concrete Composites, vol. 94, pp. 307–314, 2018. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2018.10.002
  • A. I. Laskar and S. Talukdar, “Rheological behavior of high performance concrete with mineral admixtures and their blending,” Construction and Building materials, vol. 22, no. 12, pp. 2345–2354, 2008. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2007.10.004
  • P. F. G. Banfill, “Rheological methods for assessing the flow properties of mortar and related materials,” Construction and Building materials, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 43–50, 1994. [Online]. Available:
    https://doi.org/10.1016/0950-0618(94)90007-8
  • A. Beycio˘glu and H. Y. Aruntas¸, “Workability and mechanical properties of self-compacting concretes containing llfa, gbfs and mc,” Construction
    and building materials, vol. 73, pp. 626–635, 2014. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2014.09.071
  • G. Ma, Z. Li, and L. Wang, “Printable properties of cementitious material containing copper tailings for extrusion-based 3d printing,” Construction and building materials, vol. 162, pp. 613–627, 2018. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.12.051
  • W. Huang, H. Kazemi-Kamyab, W. Sun, and K. Scrivener, “Effect of replacement of silica fume with calcined clay on the hydration and microstructural development of eco-uhpfrc,” Materials
    & Design, vol. 121, pp. 36–46, 2017. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2017.02.052
  • R. S. Ahari, T. K. Erdem, and K. Ramyar, “Thixotropy and structural breakdown properties of self-consolidating concrete containing various supplementary cementitious materials,” Cement and Concrete Composites, vol. 59, pp. 26–37, 2015. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2015.03.009
  • X. Zhang and J. Han, “The effect of ultra-fine admixture on the rheological property of cement paste,” Cement and concrete research, vol. 30, no. 5, pp. 827–830, 2000. [Online]. Available:
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0008-8846(00)00236-2
  • R. Derabla and M. L. Benmalek, “Characterization of heattreated self-compacting concrete containing mineral admixtures at early age and in the long term,” Construction and Building Materials, vol. 66, pp. 787–794, 2014. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2014.06.029
  • G. H. Tattersall, Workability and quality control of concrete. CRC Press, 1991.
  • C. Joh, J. Lee, T. Q. Bui, J. Park, and I.-H. Yang, “Buildability and mechanical properties of 3d printed concrete,” Materials, vol. 13, no. 21, p. 4919, 2020. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.3390/ma13214919
  • D. Dey, D. Srinivas, B. Panda, P. Suraneni, and T. Sitharam, “Use of industrial waste materials for 3d printing of sustainable concrete: A review,” Journal of cleaner production, vol. 340, p. 130749, 2022. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.130749
  • Y. Zhang, Y. Zhang, G. Liu, Y. Yang, M. Wu, and B. Pang, “Fresh properties of a novel 3d printing concrete ink,” Construction and building materials, vol. 174, pp. 263–271, 2018. [Online]. Available:
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.04.115
  • V. Malhotra, “The rheology of fresh concrete,” Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering, vol. 11, pp. 135–135, 1984. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1139/l84-022
  • P. Mehta and O. Gjørv, “Properties of portland cement concrete containing fly ash and condensed silica-fume,” Cement and Concrete research, vol. 12, no. 5, pp. 587–595, 1982. [Online]. Available:
    https://doi.org/10.1016/0008-8846(82)90019-9
  • C. Li, H. Sun, and L. Li, “A review: The comparison between alkali-activated slag (si+ ca) and metakaolin (si+ al) cements,” Cement and concrete research, vol. 40, no. 9, pp. 1341–1349, 2010. [Online].
    Available: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconres.2010.03.020
  • M. Bohuchval, M. Sonebi, S. Amziane, and A. Perrot, “Effect of metakaolin and natural fibres on three-dimensional printing mortar,” Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers-Construction
    Materials, vol. 174, no. 3, pp. 115–128, 2021. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1680/jcoma.20.00009
  • M. Sonebi, M. Lachemi, and K. Hossain, “Optimisation of rheological parameters and mechanical properties of superplasticised cement grouts containing metakaolin and viscosity modifying admixture,” Construction and Building Materials, vol. 38, pp. 126–138, 2013. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2012.07.102
  • 2000, n 1015-3. Methods of test for mortar for masonry. Part 3: Determination of consistency of fresh mortar (by flow table).
  • B. Panda, C. Unluer, and M. J. Tan, “Extrusion and rheology characterization of geopolymer nanocomposites used in 3d printing,” Composites Part B: Engineering, vol. 176, p. 107290, 2019. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2019.107290
  • K. R. Messer, A. Fahem, A. T. Guthai, and R. P. Singh, “The experimental methods and elastic properties of shale bedding planes materials state-of-the-art review,” Al-Qadisiyah Journal for Engineering
    Sciences, vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 126–130, 2022. [Online]. Available: https://qjes.qu.edu.iq/article 179071.html
  • M. Abdulrehman, A. Moften, A. Noori, M. Mutair, and A. Alkamal, “Investigating the mechanical and physical properties of lightweight geopolymer concrete,” Al-Qadisiyah Journal for Engineering Sciences, vol. 17, no. 2, pp. 88–96, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://qjes.qu.edu.iq/article 183784.html
  • EN 12390-3. Testing hardened concrete. Part 3: Compressive strength of test specimens. 2009.
  • EN 12390-5. Testing hardened concrete. Part 5: Flexural strength of test specimens,2009.
Al-Qadisiyah Journal for Engineering Sciences
Volume 18, Issue 3
Summer 2025
Pages 336-344

  • Receive Date 14 December 2024
  • Revise Date 08 February 2025
  • Accept Date 01 September 2025

Submit Manuscript

Guide for Authors

Article Processing Charges (APC)

Reviewers

Call for Reviewers

Contact Us