Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

1 Roads and Transportation Engineering Department, College of Engineering, University of Al-Qadisiyah, Al-Diwaniyah, Iraq.

2 Department of Civil and Environmental, College of Engineering, University of Al-Qadisiyah, Al-Diwaniyah, Iraq.

3 Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, College of Engineering, Politecnico di Milano, Milano, Italy.

10.30772/qjes.2024.153625.1388

Abstract

The labor market has been constantly changing in recent decades, so choosing the type of construction materials in general and floor finishing materials in particular is of great importance for construction projects. This research helps to determine how to choose the flooring materials used in major halls in Iraq and how to employ TOPSIS,Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to an Ideal Solution technical foundation in evaluating them. The study involves determining the criteria used to find the optimal alternative, as well as determining the quality index of those alternatives through the value engineering methodology in order to choose the best from this aspect. Therefore, arriving at appropriate alternatives for the purpose of construction works that can be implemented in the region, For the purpose of achieving the goal of the research, the data was collected from the literature that dealt with the topics of the system’s preference by similarity to the ideal solution and value engineering, finally from field visits and personal interviews with specialists from company managers and department and project managers. Descriptive, analytical, and statistical approaches were adopted for the study, and the results of data analysis showed for sample members that carpet is the most relatively important alternative that can be chosen for the purpose of constructing floors for large halls,based on the standards studied. Also, the sound insulation standard is followed by the ease of maintenance standard, and then safety is more important than the rest of the standards in evaluating alternatives to flooring materials

Keywords

  • G. Sahlol, E. Elbeltagi, M. Elzoughiby, and M. A. Elrahman, “Sustainable building materials assessment and selection using system dynamics,” Journal of Building Engineering, vol. 35, no. 2021, p. 101978, march 2021. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2020.101978
  • Maheswararao and P. Valli, “Evaluating the durability performance of concrete containing clastic sand and ggbs,” Al-Qadisiyah Journal for Engineering Sciences, vol. 17, no. 2, pp. 128–134, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.30772/qjes.2024.149157.1212
  • Bertino, J. Kisser, J. Zeilinger, T.Fischer, and D. O¨ sterreicher, “Fundamentals of building deconstruction as a circular economy strategy for the reuse of construction materials,” Applied sciences, vol. 11., no. 3, p. 939, 2021. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.3390/app11030939
  • Almusaed, A. Almssad, R. Z. Homod, and I. Yitmen, “Environmental profile on building material passports for hot climates,” Sustainability, vol. 12, no. 9, p. 3720, 2020. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.3390/su12093720
  • Khoshnava, R.Rostami, D. ˇ Streimikien˙e, A. Mardani, and M. Ismail, “The role of green building materials in reducing environmental and human health impacts,” International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, vol. 17, no. 7, p. 2589, 2020. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17072589
  • T. Balasbaneh, D. Yeoh, M. I. Juki, A. Gohari, A. R. Z. Abidin, and A. K. B. Marsono, “Applying three pillar indicator assessments on alternative floor systems: Life cycle study,” The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, vol. 26, pp. 1439–1455, 2021. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-021-01881-6
  • M., D. C., K. LR., S. M., and S. S., “Life-cycle and environmental impact assessments on the processing of plant fibers and its bio-composites: A critical review,” Journal of Industrial Textiles, vol. 51, no. 4, pp. 5518S–5542S, 2022. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1177/1528083720924730
  • R. A. Orabi, M. A., and K. S. Al-Gahtani, “A framework of selecting building flooring finishing materials by using building information modeling (bim),” Advances in Civil Engineering, vol. 2022, no. 1, p. 8556714, 2022. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/8556714
  • O. Folorunso, “Analysis of the effectiveness of wooden floor finishes in some residential buildings in lagos, nigeria,” International Journal of Building Pathology and Adaptation, vol. 39, no. 5, pp. 756–765, 2021. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1108/IJBPA-11-2019-0100
  • Demertzi, J. Silvestre, M. Garrido, J. Correia, V. Dur˜ao, and M. Proenc,a, “Life cycle assessment of alternative building floor rehabilitation systems,” Structures, vol. 26, p. 237–246, 2020. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.istruc.2020.03.060
  • G. Townsend and M. Anshassi, “Construction materials and their properties,” Construction and Demolition Debris. Cham. Springer International Publishing, vol. 2339, no. 11, pp. 29–71, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-25013-2 2
  • Vagtholm, A. Matteo, B. Vand, and L. Tupenaite, “Evolution and current state of building materials, construction methods, and building regulations in the uk: implications for sustainable building practices,” Buildings, vol. 13, no. 6, p. 1480, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings13061480
  • Bhuiyan, M. Masfiqul, and A. Hammad., “A hybrid multi-criteria decision support system for selecting the most sustainable structural material for a multistory building construction,” Sustainability, vol. 15, no. 4, p. 3128, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.3390/su15043128
  • Al-Ali and G. M. I. Kamoona, “Effectiveness of nanomaterial in the roof of the building to achieve energy conservation for indoor environment of the building,” Journal of Engineering, vol. 27, no. 2, pp. 126–148, 2021. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.31026/j.eng.2021.02.09
  • Kanters, “Circular building design: An analysis of barriers and drivers for a circular building sector,” Buildings, vol. 10, no. 4, p. 77, 2020. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings10040077
  • G. Sahlol, E. Elbeltagi, M. Elzoughiby, and M. Abd Elrahman, “Sustainable building materials assessment and selection using system dynamics,” Journal of Building Engineering, vol. 35, p. 101978, 2021. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2020.101978
  • Yadav and M. Agarwal, “Biobased building materials for sustainable future: An overview,” Materials Today: Proceedings, vol. 43, pp. 2895–2902, 2021. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.14424/ijcscm110221-166-194
  • Szennay, Z. Major, R. Horv´ath, H. Cz´edli, and C. Szigeti, “Providing decent, affordable, and sustainable housing: Analysing environmental impacts of family houses built with conventional and unconventional building materials,” Energy Footprint and Sustainability: Case Studies. Cham: Springer Nature Switzerland, pp. 105–126, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-63057-6 6
  • Yadegaridehkordi, M. Hourmand, M. Nilashi, E. Alsolami, S. Samad, M. Mahmoud, A. Alarood, A. Zainol, H. D. Majeed, and L. Shuib, “Assessment of sustainability indicators for green building manufacturing using fuzzy multi-criteria decision-making approach,” Journal of cleaner production, vol. 277, p. 122905, 2020. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.122905
  • Atta, E. S. Bakhoum, and M. M. Marzouk, “Digitizing material passport for sustainable construction projects using bim,” Journal of Building Engineering, vol. 43, p. 103233, 2021. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2021.103233
  • A. Jalil, H. I. Naji, and M. S. Mahmood, “Developing sustainable alternatives from destroyed buildings waste for reconstruction projects,” Civil Engineering Journal, vol. 6, no. 1, January 2020. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.28991/cej-2020-03091453
  • Xintian, “Research on the sustainable materials in building construction,” Applied and Computational Engineering, vol. 60, pp. 2755–2721, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.54254/2755-2721/60/20240855
  • Adriana and P. Milan, “Environmental analysis of two building material alternatives in structures with the aim of sustainable construction,” Clean Technologies and Environmental Policy, vol. 17, pp. 75–83, January 2015. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1007/S10098-014-0758-Z
  • Ros-Dosd´a, I. Celades, L. Vilalta, P. F. i Palmer, and E. Monfort, “Environmental comparison of indoor floor coverings.” Science of The Total Environment, vol. 693, p. 133519, 2019. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1016/J.SCITOTENV.2019.07.325
  • Zhong, D.-S. Hu, M., and et al., “Global greenhouse gas emissions from residential and commercial building materials and mitigation strategies to 2060,” Nature Communications, 2021. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-021-26212-z
  • Murtagh, L. Scott, and J. Fan, “Sustainable and resilient construction: Current status and future challenges,” Journal of Cleaner Production, vol. 268, p. 122264, 2020. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.122264
  • Huang, X. Gao, X. Xu, T. Fishman, H. Kua, and J. Nakatani, “A life cycle thinking framework to mitigate the environmental impact of building materials,” One Earth, vol. 3, no. 5, pp. 564–573, 2020. [Online]. Available: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.oneear.2020.10.010
  • A. A. R. A. Orabi and K. S. Al-Gahtani, “A framework of selecting building flooring finishing materials by using building information modeling (bim),” Advances in Civil Engineering, no. 1, p. 8556714, 2022. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/8556714
  • I. Emoh, “An evaluation of factors affecting the choice of the different floor finishes in the building industry within abia state of nigeria,” International Journal of Latest Engineering and Management Research, vol. 02, no. 03, pp. 54–58, 2017. [Online]. Available: https://www.academia.edu/34111696/AN EVALUATION
  • A. A. Alorabi, K. S. Al-Gahtani, and I. A. Alhammad, “Proposed systemic method for selecting finishing materials for building flooring using building information modeling (bim),” In Towards Implementation of Sustainability Concepts in Developing Countries Springer International Publishing, no. 1, pp. 165–170, 2021. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-74349-9 13
  • G. K, D. O.E., and M. P.K, “Risk assessment using fuzzy topsis and prat for sustainable engi-neering projects,” Sustainability, vol. 11, no. 3, p. 615, 2019. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.3390/su11030615
  • E. D. El-Alfy, “Design of sustainable buildings through value engineering,” Journal of Building Appraisal, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 69–79, 2010. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1057/jba.2010.14
  • Altay and E. Salcı., “Exploring designers’ finishing materials selection for residential interior spaces,” Architectural Engineering and Design Man ., vol. 20, no. 2, pp. 269–286, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1080/17452007.2023.2181753
  • O. Folorunso, “Analysis of effectiveness of wooden floor finishes in some residential buildings in lagos, nigeria,” International Journal of Building Pathology and Adaptation, vol. 39, no. 5, pp. 756–765, 2021. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1108/IJBPA-11-2019-0100
  • K. Ansah, X. Chen, H. Yang, L. Lu, and P. T. Lam, “An integrated life cycle assessment of different fac,ade systems for a typical residential building in ghana,” Sustainable Cities and Society, vol. 53, p. 101974, 2020. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2019.101974
  • Sadeghi Esfahani, “Sustainability of interior design materials for 5* hotels in the uae. diss.” The British University in Dubai (BUiD), no. 1, 2020. [Online]. Available: https://bspace.buid.ac.ae/handle/1234/1803
  • Yang, Ying Nan, “Integrated qualitative and quantitative methodology to assess validity and credibility of models for bridge maintenance management system development,” Journal of Management in Engineering, vol. 27, no. 3, pp. 149–158, 2011. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0000051
  • Ebrahimi and M. R. F. S. M. Sobhani, “A modification of technique for order preference by similarity to ideal solution (topsis) through fuzzy similarity method (a numerical example of the personnel selection,” Journal of applied research on industrial engineering, vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 203–217, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.22105/jarie.2022.296088.1359
  • A. S. F. S. A. W. S. Khofiyah, “Supplier selection using technique for order of preference by similarity to ideal solution (topsis) method: A case study,” Procedings of the International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Operations Management, no. 1, 2021. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.46254/AN11.20210409
  • I. Widjaja, H.and Desanti, “Decision support system for home selection in south tangerang city using topsis method,” IJNMT (International Journal of New Media Technology, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 76–81, 2020. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.31937/ijnmt.v7i2.1300
  • Siregar, “Supplier selection by using analytical hierarchy process (ahp) and techniques for order preference methods with similarities toideal solutions (topsis),” Journal of Physics: Conference Series. IOP Publishing, vol. 1339, no. 1, p. 012023, 2019. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1339/1/012023
  • Lapidus, I. Abramov, T. Kuzmina, A. Abramova, and Z. AlZaidi, “Study of the sustainable functioning of construction companies in the conditions of risk factors,” Buildings, vol. 13, p. 2282, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings13092282
  • Zhang and J. Dai, “A novel topsis method with decision-theoretic rough fuzzy sets,” Information Sciences, vol. 608, pp. 1221–1244, 2022. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ins.2022.07.009
  • G., D. O., and M. P.K., “Risk assessment using fuzzy topsis and prat for sustainable engi-neering projects,” Sustainability, vol. 11, no. 3, p. 615, 2019. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.3390/su11030615
  • Sekhavati and R. Jalilzadeh Yengejeh, “Assessment optimization of safety and health risks using fuzzy topsis technique (case study: construction sites in the south of iran,” Journal of Environmental Health and Sustainable Development, vol. 6, no. 4, pp. 1494–1506, 2021. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.18502/jehsd.v6i4.8154
  • Rani, A. Mishra, A. Mardani, F. Cavallaro, M. Alrasheedi, and A. Alrashidi, “A novel approach to extended fuzzy topsis based on new divergence measures for renewable energy sources selection,” Journal of Cleaner Production, vol. 257, no. 1, p. 120352, 2020. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.120352
  • Khorram, M. Sheibani, and S. Niroomand, “A decision framework based on integration of dematel, qfd, topsis and vikor approaches for fuzzy multi-criteria supplier selection problem,” Journal of Uncertain Systems, vol. 17, no. 01, p. 2440002, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1142/S1752890924400026
  • Singer and S,u¨kru¨ O¨ zs,ahin., “Prioritization of laminate flooring selection criteria from experts’ perspectives: a spherical fuzzy ahp-based model,” Architectural Engineering and Design Management, vol. 18, no. 6, pp. 911–926, 2022. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1080/17452007.2021.1956421
  • A. P. Amorocho and T. Hartmann, “A multi-criteria decision-making framework for residential building renovation using pairwise comparison and topsis methods,” Journal of building engineering, vol. 53, p. 104596, 2022. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2022.104596
  • Kutlu G¨undo˘gdu and C. Kahraman, “Optimal site selection of electric vehicle charging station by using spherical fuzzy topsis method,” Decision making with spherical fuzzy sets: Theory and applications Cham: Springer International Publishing, vol. 392, no. 1, pp. 201–216, 2020. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-45461-6 8
  • Liern and B. P´erez-Gladish, “Multiple criteria ranking method based on functional proximity index: Un-weighted topsis,” Annals of Operations Research, vol. 311, no. 2, pp. 1099–1121, 2022. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-020-03718-1
  • R. Alketbi, “Effective implementation of value engineering in the housing construction programmes of the uae,” University of Wolverhampton, no. 1, 2020. [Online]. Available: http://hdl.handle.net/2436/623758
  • A. Al-Ghamdi and K. S. Al-Gahtani, “Integrated value engineering and life cycle cost modeling for hvac system selection,” Sustainability, vol. 14, no. 4, p. 2126, 2022. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.3390/su14042126
  • M. Saud, K. S. Al-Gahtani, and A. M. Alsugair, “Exterior walls selection framework using building information modeling (bim),” Cogent Engineering, vol. 9, no. 1, p. 2088642, 2022. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1080/23311916.2022.2088642
  • Lee, “Indexing model based on vector normalization available for value engineering in building materials,” Applied Sciences, vol. 11, no. 20, p. 9515, 2021. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.3390/app11209515
  • Li, C. Wang, and A. Alashwal., “Case study on bim and value engineering integration for construction cost control,” Advances in Civil Engineering, vol. 2021, no. 1, p. 8849303, 2021. [Online]. Available: https://api.semanticscholar.org/corpusID:234022863
  • H. Khahro., A. H. Memon., N. A. Memon., Z. A. Memon., and R. Naresh, “Influence of social and economic factors on construction project performance in pakistan,” Sustainability, vol. 15, no. 3, p. 2469, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.3390/su15032469
  • Lapidus, I. Abramov., T. Kuzmina., A. Abramova, and Z. AlZaidi, “Sustainable activity of construction companies under the influence of destabilizing factors on the duration of implementation of investmentconstruction projects,” Buildings, vol. 13, no. 11, p. 2696, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings13112696